StudyWithYou is an open vocational registry. Verified learning travels with the learner — into university credit and employer pipelines.
Every credential maps to a published rubric and feeds the next rung. Learners can enter at any level and articulate forward.
Every module ships with a public capstone and transparent assessment. We don't list our internal catalogue here — the full module index lives inside the registry once you enroll.
Ten technical disciplines and two pedagogic tracks. Each module runs sixty hours across nine months and ends in a public capstone. Aligned with ABET / IEEE learning outcomes.
Honesty note: SWY issues a Professional Certificate aligned with ABET / IEEE learning outcomes. Where students wish to convert completed work into formal academic credit, articulation is handled on a case-by-case basis through partner institutions listed at /partners/universities.
A teacher-education programme built on the TPACK model — Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge held in equal mastery — and benchmarked against the UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, the ISTE Standards for Educators and the CSTA K–12 Computer Science Standards. Five mastery modules give the student-teacher subject depth far beyond the secondary curriculum, the pedagogic craft to teach it, and the technological fluency to lead a digital classroom — in any country, in any language, in any school system.
Built on the TPACK model — Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge held in equal mastery. Student-teachers acquire subject depth beyond the secondary curriculum, the pedagogic craft to teach it, and the technological fluency to lead a digital classroom anywhere in the world.
Understand hardware architecture, OS internals and software classification at engineering depth — to troubleshoot labs and explain abstract concepts concretely.
Master information systems, AI, robotics and ethics to guide students through the societal role of IT.
Become a proficient programmer and database designer to teach coding, algorithms and the SDLC effectively.
Configure networks, troubleshoot connectivity and secure systems — well enough to teach networking with confidence.
Integrate all skills to solve complex real-world problems and manage ICT projects end-to-end.
Articulation note: this programme is benchmarked to UNESCO ICT-CFT (Knowledge Acquisition + Knowledge Deepening tiers), the TPACK framework, ISTE Educator Standards and CSTA K–12 Computer Science Standards, and is credited at Level 6 (45 ECTS) by SWY. Conversion into a national teaching diploma or BSc Ed. (ICT) is handled case-by-case with partner ministries and universities.
The BSc-depth track ends with a 12-week industry-sponsored project — replacing the old 100-hour capstone. Every learner ships a real system to a real sponsor and defends it before an external panel.
Learner is matched to an industry sponsor (start-up, NGO, public agency or SME). Joint scoping document signed by sponsor, learner and SWY tutor.
User research, data audit, system architecture proposal. Architecture review with the sponsor's CTO or designated technical lead.
Three two-week sprints with public sprint reviews. Code shipped to a sponsor-controlled repository. Weekly demo to the cohort circle.
Security review, performance testing, documentation, runbooks. Sponsor sign-off on acceptance criteria.
Defence before a panel of one academic, one industry and one SWY assessor. Public artefacts published to the learner's registry portfolio.
A 12-month spiral that revisits each core CSC topic at greater depth — technical theory, curriculum design, and educational research — culminating in a thesis and a public portfolio.
Spiral curriculum. Each core CSC topic is revisited at greater depth across technical theory, curriculum design, and educational research — moving the student from 'how to do it' to 'why it works, how to research it, and how to teach it'.
Honest framing: a Master's-level research project, not a doctoral thesis. Six months of dedicated research with mid-project review, public defence and an external assessor.
From 'using software' to 'analysing software ethics & system architecture'.
From 'writing loops' to 'algorithmic complexity & computational theory'.
From 'coding in C/Pascal' to 'compiler design & software-engineering research'.
From 'logic gates' to 'processor design & parallel computing'.
From 'setting up LANs' to 'protocol analysis & cybersecurity forensics'.
From 'MS Access tables' to 'big data, NoSQL & database administration'.
Open the 6-month Capstone Research Project. Choose method, scope question, secure ethics approval.
Build the theoretical scaffolding. Produce a publishable design artefact alongside the research.
Run the study. Collect, code and clean the evidence base.
Turn the dataset into a defensible thesis chapter set.
Public defence and registry-anchored portfolio.
Honesty note: SWY confers a Master’s-level professional credential (60 ECTS, Level 7 EQF-aligned). National recognition as a state Master’s degree is handled case-by-case with partner universities through the articulation registry.
A great syllabus only works if real people are reachable, often. Here is the mentorship density and cohort architecture you get with every SWY cohort — published, not promised in a sales call.
Six-learner circles meet weekly to peer-review code, lesson plans and capstone progress. Facilitated by a senior alum.
Open async forum + weekly live studio with practising engineers, teachers and researchers. Mentors commit a minimum of 4 hours per cohort week.
Capstones and theses are defended before a panel that always includes one external assessor (university, ministry or industry).
Graduates remain in the registry; mentees can be matched to alumni working in their target country or sector.
Mentor hours and cohort sizes are contractually committed per cohort and audited at graduation. If a cohort fails to receive its committed hours, learners receive partial fee credit toward the next program.
Every SWY credential is assessed against the rubric below before it is anchored in the registry. Weights are fixed; level descriptors are public; defence panels apply them on the record.
Architecture quality, code quality, test coverage, performance.
Did the sponsor sign acceptance? Was the brief delivered?
Sprints, ADRs, code review, security review.
Clarity, response to challenge, technical depth.
Runbook, user manual, ADRs, security review.
Most online programs are vague about the line between alignment and accreditation. We publish ours. Read this before you enroll, sponsor a learner, or sign an articulation agreement.
We coordinate subsidized intakes per country node. Status — Open, Cohort, Waitlist, Pilot — is published only to verified applicants so listings stay honest. Browse country availability inside the registry after you start.
External resources live on dedicated pages — not crowding the homepage. Each card opens a curated index with direct links to public admissions, careers, and apprenticeship portals.
UniversitiesInstitutions whose admissions and credit-articulation pages we map against our discipline matrix.
EmployersOrganizations whose public hiring and apprenticeship pipelines align with our modules.
Honesty note: external organizations are listed as public resources. We name an organization on those pages only when a verifiable partnership or articulation request exists.
Browse programs and country nodes.
Submit identity and intent.
We match you to a cohort and mentor.
Verified outcome travels with you.
Reserve a place in the next country cohort. We respond within five business days.
